Websockets vs REST API vs API: Choosing the Right Communication Protocol for Your Web Application

in API

October 1, 2024 7 min read
Websockets vs REST API vs API: Choosing the Right Communication Protocol for Your Web Application

Low latency, highest quality text to speech API

clone voiceClone your voice
Free API Playground

Table of Contents

When building modern web applications, selecting the right method for client-server communication is crucial. There are various protocols and architectural styles available, with Websockets, REST APIs, and general APIs being among the most popular. Each has its use cases, advantages, and limitations, depending on your specific needs. So, how do you decide which one to use?

Let’s break down these terms, highlight their differences, and help you make the best choice for your application.

Defining the Terms

API (Application Programming Interface)

At its core, an API is a set of rules that allows different software applications to communicate with each other. It serves as a bridge between different systems or components, making it easier for developers to request and send data across platforms. APIs expose endpoints, which represent different services or data that can be accessed programmatically.

Common API types include:

  1. REST (Representational State Transfer): The most widely used API architecture.
  2. SOAP (Simple Object Access Protocol): An older, more structured protocol.
  3. Websocket API: Designed for real-time communication.

APIs can exchange data in formats like JSON or XML. Examples of APIs include cloud services like AWS or social media integrations (Twitter API).

REST API (Representational State Transfer)

A REST API is an architectural style that runs on top of HTTP and is used for creating scalable web services. It is stateless, meaning each HTTP request from a client contains all the information the server needs to fulfill that request—there is no client session stored on the server.

Key features of REST:

  1. Stateless: No session state is stored on the server between requests.
  2. HTTP Methods: Common operations include GET (read), POST (create), PUT (update), and DELETE (delete).
  3. Unidirectional: The client sends requests, and the server responds (not vice versa).

Websockets

Unlike REST, Websockets enable bidirectional communication between a client and server, providing a persistent connection. Once the connection is established, it remains open, allowing real-time updates to flow in both directions with minimal latency.

Key features of Websockets:

  1. Full-duplex communication: Data can be sent and received simultaneously.
  2. Real-time updates: Ideal for applications requiring low-latency data transfer, like chat or live financial tickers.
  3. Persistent TCP connection: A single connection is kept open for continuous communication.

Now that we’ve defined the key terms, let’s dive into the pros, cons, and use cases of each.

REST API vs Websockets: Pros, Cons, and Use Cases

REST API: Pros, Cons, and Use Cases

Pros:

  1. Statelessness: Because no client information is stored on the server, REST APIs are highly scalable. You can use caching mechanisms to optimize responses and reduce server load.
  2. Wide Adoption: REST is a standard and is supported by most web browsers, frontend frameworks (e.g., React, Angular), and backend frameworks (e.g., Node.js, Python’s Flask or Django).
  3. Simple and Secure: REST uses existing HTTP methods and provides robust options for authentication (e.g., OAuth, API keys, SSL encryption).

Cons:

  1. Higher Latency: Each HTTP request creates a new connection and closes it after the response is sent. This can lead to performance bottlenecks in real-time applications.
  2. Unidirectional: REST APIs do not support real-time updates from the server to the client. To achieve something similar, developers often use techniques like polling or long-polling, which are not efficient.

Use Cases:

  1. CRUD operations: When your app primarily involves Create, Read, Update, and Delete operations.
  2. Web services: REST is great for creating web services that need to be consumed by a variety of clients (mobile apps, web apps, etc.).
  3. HTTP-based applications: Typical web applications where real-time interaction is not necessary, such as blogs, online stores, or banking applications.

Websockets: Pros, Cons, and Use Cases

Pros:

  1. Low Latency and High Performance: Websockets use a persistent TCP connection, avoiding the need to open and close connections for each message. This is perfect for scenarios requiring real-time communication.
  2. Bidirectional Communication: Allows for full-duplex communication—the client and server can send and receive messages simultaneously, making it ideal for chat applications or live updates.
  3. Efficient Data Exchange: Since there’s no need to send HTTP headers for each message, Websockets are more efficient for frequent, small data exchanges.

Cons:

  1. Complexity: Implementing Websockets is more complicated than a REST API, and error handling or reconnection logic can add to the complexity.
  2. Scalability: Websockets maintain a constant connection with each client, which can be resource-intensive, especially in highly scalable applications with thousands of users.

Use Cases:

  1. Real-time applications: Ideal for chat apps, stock tickers, multiplayer games, and real-time notifications.
  2. Collaborative tools: Applications like Google Docs or Trello, where users interact and update in real-time.
  3. Live streaming: For apps that need to handle live data streams, like sports scores, video, or live auctions.

Websockets vs REST API: When to Use Each

Use Websockets if:

  1. Your application requires real-time communication (chat, notifications, or live data updates).
  2. You need low-latency and bidirectional communication.
  3. You want to avoid the overhead of repeatedly opening new connections, as is common with REST APIs.

Use REST APIs if:

  1. Your application primarily involves CRUD operations or consumes web services.
  2. You need a simpler, more scalable solution.
  3. You don’t need real-time updates, or polling mechanisms are sufficient for your needs.

A Hybrid Approach: Combining REST and Websockets

Many modern applications use both REST APIs and Websockets. For example, a social media app might use a REST API for most CRUD operations (like fetching user profiles or posting content) and Websockets for real-time features (like notifications or messaging).

Here’s an example:

Node.js backend with Express (REST) and Socket.io (Websockets) to provide both traditional API endpoints and real-time functionality in the same app.

Choosing between Websockets and REST APIs depends on your specific use case and the type of communication your app requires. REST is a tried-and-true method that’s ideal for web services and stateless operations. Websockets, on the other hand, excel in real-time and low-latency scenarios. In some cases, combining the two gives you the best of both worlds.

So, whether you’re building a high-traffic chat application, a real-time stock trading platform, or a straightforward e-commerce site, understanding the strengths and limitations of each will help you make the right choice for your project.

Here’s a table comparing Websockets, REST API, and General API based on pros, cons, and best for/use cases:

Communication MethodProsConsBest For / Use Case
WebsocketsReal-time updates (low latency)– More complex to implementReal-time applications (chat apps, live streaming, multiplayer games)
Full-duplex communication (bidirectional)– Requires a persistent connection, can be resource-intensiveCollaborative tools (real-time editing, whiteboards)
– Efficient data exchange (no need for headers in each message)– Scaling can be challenging with large numbers of usersLive notifications (sports scores, financial tickers)
REST APIStateless (easy to scale and cache)– Higher latency due to new connections for each requestCRUD operations (Create, Read, Update, Delete data)
– Simple and widely adopted– Unidirectional communication (client to server)Web services (e-commerce, blog platforms, cloud APIs)
– Built on HTTP (leverages common methods like GET, POST, PUT, DELETE)– Lacks real-time communication (requires polling for real-time data)Interacting with web services (e.g., AWS, social media APIs)
General APIFlexible (can use different protocols like REST, Websockets, SOAP)– Needs a specific architecture or protocol to be effectiveSoftware integrations (connecting different systems or services)
– Abstracts communication rules across platforms– Performance depends on the protocol being usedAccessing cloud services or external resources

This comparison should help clarify when to use each communication method based on your application’s needs, balancing real-time capabilities with ease of use and scalability.

Recent Posts

Listen & Rate TTS Voices

See Leaderboard

Top AI Apps

Alternatives

Similar articles